An Investigation into the Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on the Performance of Intermediate Writers of English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v7i2.373Keywords:
Corrective feedback, Second language writing, Oral corrective feedback, Written Corrective feedbackAbstract
In the last three decades, several researchers have investigated the effects of corrective feedback on language learners’ oral and writing performance. The mixed results of the empirical studies conducted by scholars throughout the world calls for more investigations to uncover the unknown aspects of corrective feedback. The present study attempted to disclose the benefits of written corrective feedback by comparing its effects with those of the oral corrective feedback. The present study focused on different writing components which are content, organization, language use, vocabulary, and mechanics. Thirty-four intermediate English language learners of two intact classes, who were selected based on convenience sampling, participated in this study. The students of one of these classes received oral corrective feedback and the students of the other class were provided with written corrective feedback. The results indicated that both oral and written corrective feedback improved second language students’ writing ability. However, written corrective feedback was significantly more successful in improving the participants’ writing ability. The findings also indicated that written corrective feedback was significantly superior to oral corrective feedback in the three areas of organization, language use, and mechanics. In the two areas of vocabulary and content, the differences were not significant, however.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, M. & Shekarabi, Z. (2014). The role of written corrective feedback in enhancing the linguistic accuracy of Iranian Japanese learners’ writing. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 2(1), 99-118.
Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arnaudet. M. L., & Barrett. M. E. (1990). Paragraph Development. London: Published Pearson Education.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen C. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. Thomson Wadsworth, Australia.
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 227-257.
Bitchener, J. & Knoch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research, 12, 409-431.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Chandler, J. (2003). The Efficacy of Various Kinds for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. R. & Hedgcock, J. (1998). Teaching ESL composition: purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Frantzen, D. (1995). The effects of grammar supplementation on written accuracy in an intermediate Spanish content course. Modern Language Journal, 79, 329-344.
Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hyland, K & Hyland, F (Eds.). (2006). Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues applied linguistics series. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge University.
Jacobs, H.L., Zinkgraf, S.A., Wormuth, D.R., Hartfiel, V.F., & Hughey, J.B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: A practical approach. Rowley, Mass. Newbury House Publishers, Inc.
Kassimt, A., & Luan Ngr, L. (2014). Investigating the efficacy of focused and unfocused corrective feedback on the accurate use of prepositions in written work. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 21-40.
Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95.
Long, M. H. (2007). Recasts in SLA: The story so far. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Problems in SLA (pp. 75–116). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mubarak, M. (2013). Corrective feedback in L2 writing: A study of practices and effectiveness in the Bahrain context. PhD dissertation. University of Sheffield.
Polio, C., Fleck, N., & Leder, N. (1998). “If only I had more time”: ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43–68.
Richards, J.C., & Renandya, W.A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37, 556-569.
Trahey, M. & White, L. (1993). Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181-204.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 111–122.
Truscott J. & Hsu, A.Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292–305.
Vonderwell, S., & Zachariah, S. (2005). Factors that Influence Participation in Online Learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 213-230.
White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-61.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Dewinarto Nainggolan, Rina Octavia Simarmata, Fenty Debora Napitupulu, An Error Analysis of Inflectional Affixes in Writing Analytical Exposition Text on Students at SMAN 3 Medan , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Suriani Simangunsong, Fenty Debora Napitupulu, Usman Sidabutar, The Effectiveness of Think Talk Write (TTW) Strategy in Teaching Writing Analytical Exposition Text Toward Students at SMAN 3 Medan , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Augusta Chiedu Assimonye, Chinasa Florence Okoh, Impact of curriculum Differentiation on Students’ interest in English Language in Secondary Schools , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Mutemi, D. Theresa , Prospery M. Mwila, School Quality Assurance Feedback: Its Role in Promoting the Teaching Process in Public Secondary Schools in Temeke Municipality, Tanzania , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Hossein Salarian , An Investigation into English as a Foreign Language Textbooks in Vocational and Technical Schools , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Atzally Maharani Irtin, Zahrodin Fanani, Joko Ariyanto, The Implementation of Animated Video Media in Improving Arabic Vocabulary Masteryof Students at Madrasah Aliyah Ibadurrahman Stabat Langkat , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Safa Alrumayh, Nahid Ayad, Khuloud Alouzi, DafaAllah Ibrahim, Mahmoud Abdullah, Mohieddin Masoud, Majdy Kasheem, Perceptions of Islamic Studies, Sharia, and Law Students Towards the Use of Artificial Intelligence in English Learning , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Rachel Kalonga, Prospery M. Mwila, Effect of Class Size on Quality of Education in Public Secondary Schools in Temeke Municipality, Tanzania , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Ann Ngozi Ugobueze , Learning Procedures as the Basic Skill for the Upskill in STEM Education , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
- Salem Aladi, Sami Barkah, Philosophical Inquiry in the Age of AI and digital technologies: Critical Thinking Pedagogy for Digital Natives , Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI): Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
|
Support > Partner > Tools > Indexing
|
Contact > Adrees > Website |
Statistic |
For Author > Template
|
 |
|---|
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 |
