Developing Future Teachers’ Information Competence in Inclusive Education: A Comparative Study of Uzbekistan and Indonesia within the WFIEd Framework

Authors

  • Dustnazar Omonovich Khimmataliev Chirchik State Pedagogical University Uzbekistan
  • Nilufar Parda Qizi Omonova Chirchik State Pedagogical University Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v8i1.726

Keywords:

inclusive education, future teachers, information competence, information literacy, comparative education, Indonesia, Uzbekistan, WFIEd

Abstract

This study investigates the development of future teachers’ information competence in inclusive education settings through a comparative analysis of Uzbekistan and Indonesia. Information competence is conceptualized as an integrative construct comprising cognitive, operational–practical, motivational–value, and reflective components. Using theoretical analysis and comparative pedagogy methods, the research highlights significant differences between national teacher education models. The Indonesian experience, particularly the reflective–research-based approach advanced by Professor Ediyanto Ediyanto at Universitas Negeri Malang, demonstrates a systematic integration of information analysis, adaptation, and pedagogical decision-making. The WFIEd framework is positioned as a mechanism for international methodological alignment. Based on the findings, the article proposes evidence-based recommendations for improving methodologies for developing information competence among future teachers in inclusive education contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97.

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890

Bates, T. (2019). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Vancouver: BCcampus.

Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.

Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for inclusion: Developing learning and participation in schools (3rd ed.). Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Ediyanto, E. (2018). Teacher readiness for inclusive education in Indonesia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 22(7), 734–748.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1412510

Ediyanto, E., & Kawai, N. (2023). The measurement of teachers' attitudes toward inclusive education: An empirical study in East Java, Indonesia. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2229014. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2229014

Ediyanto, E., Kustawan, D., & Suryani, N. (2020). Developing teachers’ reflective competence for inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(9), 987–1003.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1514750

European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education. (2018). Teacher education for inclusion. Brussels.

Khimmataliev, D. O. (2022). Developing professional competence of future teachers in inclusive education settings. Pedagogical Education and Innovations, 4(2), 15–22.

Khimmataliev, D. O., & Omonova, N. P. (2023). Developing information competence of future teachers in a digital inclusive learning environment. Modern Education, 6(1), 28–35.

Méndez, V. G., Suelves, D. M., Méndez, C. G., Ramon-Llin Mas, J. A., & Romero, J. (2023). Future teachers facing the use of technology for inclusion: A view from the digital competence. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 9305–9323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11105-5

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST.

OECD. (2019). Trends shaping education 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2021). Digital education outlook: Pushing the frontiers with AI, blockchain and robots. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Omonova, N. P. (2021). Methodological foundations of teacher activity in inclusive education. Special Pedagogy and Psychology, 3(1), 41–48.

Omonova, N. P., & Khimmataliev, D. O. (2024). Developing future teachers’ information competence in inclusive education contexts. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 19(2), 112–123.

Robert, I. V. (2014). Information educational environment: Theory and practice. Moscow: BINOM.

Sahlberg, P. (2015). Finnish lessons 2.0: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? New York: Teachers College Press.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

UNESCO. (2017). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education – All means all. Paris: UNESCO.

World Federation of Inclusive Education (WFIEd). (2021). International guidelines for inclusive teacher education. WFIEd Publications.

Zenkina, S. V. (2016). Information and communication educational environment as a pedagogical system. Pedagogika, 5, 34–42.

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-09

 

How to Cite

Khimmataliev , D. O., & Omonova, N. P. Q. (2026). Developing Future Teachers’ Information Competence in Inclusive Education: A Comparative Study of Uzbekistan and Indonesia within the WFIEd Framework . Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI), 8(1), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.61227/arji.v8i1.726

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): Action Research Journal Indonesia (ARJI)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Similar Articles

<< < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.